Ultimately, scientists must compare the results from all these different methods. But if the estimates differ, some scientists say, all the better. Even without evidence for such outlandish scenarios, finding a reliable estimate of neutrino mass would push physics in a new direction. The Standard Model of particle physics, the best theory researchers have to describe the particles and forces in the universe, predicted neutrinos were weightless. The fact that they are not presents the possibility of expanding the theory.
Finding the missing piece about neutrinos could definitely be the key to understanding what dark energy and dark matter are, because they are also not in the Standard Model. The cosmological piece of the answer stands to get more precise in the next decade, as some eagerly awaited new telescopes come online.
The European Euclid telescope, for instance, will drastically improve the precision of 3-D cosmic maps after it launches in And the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument in Arizona will soon begin surveying the distances of 30 million galaxies. Finally, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, under construction in Chile, will image the whole sky every few nights, starting in She has a bachelor's degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science journalism from the University of California, Santa Cruz.
Follow Clara Moskowitz on Twitter. Of particular relevance are the upcoming neutrino oscillation facilities, as they will be able to measure the neutrino mass ordering with astonishing precision without relying on combinations of different data sets.
Some of these future devices could also identify the neutrino mass ordering via the detection of matter effects in the neutrino fluxes emitted at the eventual explosion of a supernova in our galaxy or in its neighborhood. On the other hand, medium baseline reactor neutrino detectors such as JUNO or RENO will also be able to extract the neutrino mass ordering despite matter effects are negligible for these two experiments.
They will focus instead on an extremely accurate measurement of the survival electron antineutrino probability. These limits, however, will apply only in case neutrinos have a Majorana nature. Moreover, the determination of the neutrino mass ordering may be complicated by the presence of a light sterile neutrino at the eV scale, as currently suggested by the NEOS and DANSS results. Concerning future cosmological projects, the combination of different probes will still be required.
All these future probes may either confirm or reject the current strong preference 3. Such a preference has kept gaining significance in the recent years, thanks to the fact that current neutrino oscillation experiments have enormously improved our knowledge of neutrino flavor physics.
PFdS, CT, and MT have contributed mainly to review the current status of neutrino oscillations as well as to the summary of the prospects on the neutrino mass ordering from future neutrino oscillation experiments. SG has contributed to review beta and neutrinoless double beta decay current status and future prospects.
SG has also led the Global Bayesian analysis results. PFdS and SG have also contributed to review the present and future cosmological bounds and have also reviewed the prospects from relic neutrino detection. OM has mainly contributed to review the cosmological bounds on the mass ordering and the perspectives from future 21 cm surveys and core-collapse supernovae.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. We thank C. Giunti for providing us the two panels constituting Figure 7 and M. Hirsch for his suggestions on how to improve the first version of the manuscript. Esteban et al. This does not include the possibility that the lightest neutrino mass is much larger than the mass splittings obtained by neutrino oscillation measurements, since in this case the neutrino masses are degenerate.
Akhmedov et al. See also Long et al. BAO ones. Among them, the one based on Cepheid variables. Aalbers, J. JCAP Aalseth, C. Aartsen, M. Google Scholar. Determining neutrino oscillation parameters from atmospheric muon neutrino disappearance with three years of IceCube DeepCore data.
D Abazajian, K. Cosmological and astrophysical neutrino mass measurements. Neutrino mass and dark energy from weak lensing. Abbott, T. Dark energy survey year 1 results: cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Dark energy survey year 1 results: measurement of the baryon acoustic oscillation Scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1. Abdurashitov, J. Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal.
III: Results for the — data-taking period. C Abe, K. Physics potentials with the second hyper-kamiokande detector in Korea. PTEP C Hyper-kamiokande design report. Indication of electron neutrino appearance from an accelerator-produced Off-axis muon neutrino beam. Abe, Y. JHEP Abell, P. Abgrall, N. AIP Conf. High Energy Phys. Acciarri, R. Adam, A. Adam, R. Planck results. Overview of products and scientific results. Adams, D. Adamson, P. Ade, P. Cosmological parameters. Adrian-Martinez, S. Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.
G 43, B, — Afshordi, N. On the stability of dark energy with mass-varying neutrinos. Agarwalla, S. Aghamousa, A. Aghanim, N. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters.
Planck intermediate results. Reduction of large-scale systematic effects in HFI polarization maps and estimation of the reionization optical depth. Secondary anisotropies of the CMB. Agostini, M. Nature , 47— Aharmim, B. An independent measurement of the total active B-8 solar neutrino flux using an array of He-3 proportional counters at the sudbury neutrino observatory.
Low energy threshold analysis of the Phase I and Phase II data sets of the sudbury neutrino observatory. Ahmad, Q. Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory.
Ahmed, S. Pramana Ahmed, Z. Ahn, M. Measurement of neutrino oscillation by the K2K experiment. Akhmedov, E. Series expansions for three flavor neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter. Supernova neutrinos: difference of muon-neutrino - tau-neutrino fluxes and conversion effects.
Alam, S. Albert, J. Sensitivity and discovery potential of nEXO to neutrinoless double beta decay. Search for Majorana neutrinos with the first two years of EXO data. Nature , — Alduino, C.
CUORE-0 detector: design, construction and operation. Alekseev, E. Possible detection of a neutrino signal on 23 february at the baksan undergroundscintillation telescope of the institute of nuclear research.
JETP Lett. Alekseev, I. Alenkov, V. Ali, Z. Ali-Haimoud, Y. An efficient implementation of massive neutrinos in non-linear structure formation simulations. Allen, S. A Preference for a non-zero neutrino mass from cosmological data. Cosmological parameters from observations of galaxy clusters. Allison, R. Towards a cosmological neutrino mass detection. D , 92 12 Alonso, J. Advanced scintillator detector concept ASDC : a Concept Paper on the physics potential of water-based liquid scintillator.
Alpert, B. Amendola, L. Cosmology and fundamental physics with the euclid satellite. Living Rev. An, F. Neutrino physics with JUNO. G Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay. Measurement of electron antineutrino oscillation based on days of operation of the Daya Bay experiment.
D D Ananthakrishnan, S. Anderson, L. The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the data release 9 spectroscopic galaxy sample. Andringa, S. Angrik, J. Archidiacono, M. Physical effects involved in the measurements of neutrino masses with future cosmological data. Cosmic dark radiation and neutrinos. Neutrino and dark radiation properties in light of recent CMB observations. D , 87 10 Updated constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions from Planck.
Efficient calculation of cosmological neutrino clustering in the non-linear regime. Axion hot dark matter bounds after Planck.
Arnold, R. Probing new physics models of neutrinoless double beta decay with superNEMO. C 70, — Arteaga, M. Impact of beyond the standard model physics in the detection of the cosmic neutrino background. Artusa, D. Ascencio-Sosa, M. Matter effects in neutrino visible decay at future long-baseline experiments. Asner, D. Single electron detection and spectroscopy via relativistic cyclotron radiation. Aubourg, E. Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements.
Audren, B. Neutrino masses and cosmological parameters from a Euclid-like survey: markov chain monte carlo forecasts including theoretical errors. Azzolini, O. Bakhti, P. Sensitivities to charged-current nonstandard neutrino interactions at DUNE. Baldi, M. Cosmic degeneracies — I. Joint N-body simulations of modified gravity and massive neutrinos. Balieiro Gomes, G. Quantum decoherence effects in neutrino oscillations at DUNE.
Ballett, P. Banerjee, A. Simulating nonlinear cosmological structure formation with massive neutrinos. Reducing noise in cosmological N-body simulations with neutrinos. JCAP arXiv Baracchini, E. Barenboim, G. Diagnostic potential of cosmic-neutrino absorption spectroscopy. Barger, V. B, 55— Barkana, R. Possible interaction between baryons and dark-matter particles revealed by the first stars. Nature , 71— A Method for separating the physics from the astrophysics of high-redshift 21 cm fluctuations.
Probing the epoch of early baryonic infall through 21cm fluctuations. Signs of Dark Matter at cm? Barreira, A. Modified gravity with massive neutrinos as a testable alternative cosmological model.
Basse, T. Dark energy properties from large future galaxy surveys. Bautista, J. Beacom, J. Neutrinoless universe. Mass signature of supernova muon-neutrino and tau-neutrino neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande.
Beardsley, A. Adding context to james webb space telescope surveys with current and future 21cm radio observations. Behera, S. Bell, N. Cosmological signatures of interacting neutrinos. Bellini, G. Final results of Borexino Phase-I on low energy solar neutrino spectroscopy. D , Bellomo, N.
Hiding neutrino mass in modified gravity cosmologies. Benson, B. Berlin, A. Severely constraining dark matter interpretations of the cm anomaly. Berryman, J. Sterile neutrino at the deep underground neutrino experiment.
Large, extra dimensions at the deep underground neutrino experiment. Betoule, M. Betts, S. Beutler, F. The 6dF galaxy survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local hubble constant. Bionta, R. Observation of a neutrino burst in coincidence with supernova SN a in the large magellanic cloud. Bird, S. Bjaelde, O. Neutrino dark energy—revisiting the stability issue. Blake, C. The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: mapping the distance-redshift relation with baryon acoustic oscillations.
Blas, D. Blennow, M. Prospects for cosmic neutrino detection in tritium experiments in the case of hierarchical neutrino masses. On the Bayesian approach to neutrino mass ordering. Non-Unitarity, sterile neutrinos, and Non-Standard neutrino Interactions.
Quantifying the sensitivity of oscillation experiments to the neutrino mass ordering. Neutrino propagation in matter. Boehm, C. Increasing Neff with particles in thermal equilibrium with neutrinos. Bond, J.
Forecasting cosmic parameter errors from microwave background anisotropy experiments. Radical compression of cosmic microwave background data. Massive neutrinos and the large scale structure of the universe. Bourboux, H. Bowman, J. Constraints on fundamental cosmological parameters with upcoming epoch of reionization observations. An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum. Nature , 67— Brandbyge, J. Grid based linear neutrino perturbations in cosmological N-body simulations.
Brookfield, A. Cosmology with massive neutrinos coupled to dark energy. Cosmology of mass-varying neutrinos driven by quintessence: theory and observations. Bull, P. Late-time cosmology with 21cm intensity mapping experiments. Burns, J. Probing the first stars and black holes in the early universe with the dark ages radio explorer DARE. Space Res. Busca, N. Caldwell, A. A global bayesian analysis of neutrino mass data. Caldwell, R.
Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state. Canac, N. Testing for new physics: neutrinos and the primordial power spectrum. Capozzi, F. Global constraints on absolute neutrino masses and their ordering. Current unknowns in the three neutrino framework. Neutrino oscillations in dark backgrounds.
Carbone, C. Measuring the neutrino mass from future wide galaxy cluster catalogues. Neutrino constraints from future nearly all-sky spectroscopic galaxy surveys. We know neutrinos come in three flavors. This feat is only possible because they have non-zero mass. Neutrinos are a type of fundamental particle known as a fermion. All other fermions, such as leptons and quarks, gain their mass through their interactions with the Higgs boson.
Physicists have proposed hundreds of theories for how neutrinos might get their mass, and everyone has their favorite. Maybe the neutrino masses are the interplay of the Higgs boson and this new source of mass. For many, the thrill comes from trying to narrow it down. You might call most particles ambidextrous; they come in both left- and right-handed varieties.
When a particle interacts with the Higgs field, it switches its handedness from left to right or right to left. This switch needs to happen for the field to give the particle mass. But in the case of neutrinos, this is more complicated.
The apparent lack of right-handed neutrino forms the main mystery of neutrino masses. Figuring out how neutrinos acquire mass may resolve other, seemingly related mysteries , such as why there is more matter than antimatter in the universe.
Competing theories for the mass-generating mechanism predict different values for the three mass states. While neutrino oscillation experiments have measured the differences between the mass states, experiments like KATRIN home in on a kind of average of the three. Combining the two types of measurements can reveal the value of each mass state, favoring certain theories of neutrino mass over others.
Neutrino mass is also of cosmic importance. Despite their minuscule mass, so many neutrinos were born during the Big Bang that their collective gravity influenced how all the matter in the universe clumped together into stars and galaxies. About a second after the Big Bang, neutrinos were flying around at almost light speed — so fast that they escaped the gravitational pull of other matter. But then they started to slow, which enabled them to help corral atoms, stars and galaxies.
The point at which neutrinos began to slow down depends on their mass. Heavier neutrinos would have decelerated sooner and helped make the universe clumpier.
0コメント