Organized socialism never became powerful in the United States. Figure Capitalist nations are found primarily in North America and Western Europe but also exist in other parts of the world.
Source: Adapted from The Heritage Foundation. Distribution of economic freedom. As with capitalism, the basic ideas behind socialism go far back in history. Plato, in ancient Greece, suggested a republic in which people shared their material goods. Early Christian communities believed in common ownership, as did the systems of monasteries set up by various religious orders.
Many of the leaders of the French Revolution called for the abolition of all private property, not just the estates of the aristocracy they had overthrown.
A utopia has since come to mean an imagined place or situation in which everything is perfect. Most experimental utopian communities had the abolition of private property as a founding principle. Modern socialism really began as a reaction to the excesses of uncontrolled industrial capitalism in the s and s. The enormous wealth and lavish lifestyles enjoyed by owners contrasted sharply with the miserable conditions of the workers. Some of the first great sociological thinkers studied the rise of socialism.
In his book, What Is Property? By this he meant that if an owner did not work to produce or earn the property, then the owner was stealing it from those who did.
Proudhon believed economies could work using a principle called mutualism , under which individuals and cooperative groups would exchange products with one another on the basis of mutually satisfactory contracts Proudhon By far the most important influential thinker on socialism is Karl Marx.
Through his own writings and those with his collaborator, industrialist Friedrich Engels, Marx used a scientific analytical process to show that throughout history, the resolution of class struggles caused changes in economies. He saw the relationships evolving from slave and owner, to serf and lord, to journeyman and master, to worker and owner.
Neither Marx nor Engels thought socialism could be used to set up small utopian communities. Rather, they believed a socialist society would be created after workers rebelled against capitalistic owners and seized the means of production.
They felt industrial capitalism was a necessary step that raised the level of production in society to a point it could progress to a socialist and then communist state Marx and Engels These ideas form the basis of the sociological perspective of social conflict theory. People have debated the relative merits of capitalism and socialism at least since the time of Marx Bowles, ; Cohen, Compared to socialism, capitalism seems to have several advantages.
It produces greater economic growth and productivity, at least in part because it provides more incentives i. It also is often characterized by greater political freedom in the form of civil rights and liberties. As an economic system, capitalism seems to lend itself to personal freedom: because its hallmarks include the private ownership of the means of production and the individual pursuit of profit, there is much more emphasis in capitalist societies on the needs and desires of the individual and less emphasis on the need for government intervention in economic and social affairs.
Yet capitalism also has its drawbacks. There is much more economic inequality in capitalism than in socialism. Although capitalism produces economic growth, not all segments of capitalism share this growth equally, and there is a much greater difference between the rich and poor than under socialism. People can become very rich in capitalist nations, but they can also remain quite poor.
Another possible drawback depends on whether you prefer competition or cooperation. Children in the United States are raised with more of an individual orientation than children in socialist societies, who learn that the needs of their society are more important than the needs of the individual. Whereas U. More generally, capitalism is said by its critics to encourage selfish and even greedy behavior: if individuals try to maximize their profit, they do so at the expense of others.
In competition, someone has to lose. If so, that company succeeds even if some other party is hurting. The small Mom-and-Pop grocery stores, drugstores, and hardware stores are almost a thing of the past, as big-box stores open their doors and drive their competition out of business.
To its critics, then, capitalism encourages harmful behavior. Yet it is precisely this type of behavior that is taught in business schools. The economies of Denmark, pictured here, and several other Western European nations feature a combination of capitalism and socialism that is called democratic socialism.
In these economies, the government owns important industries, but private property and political freedom remain widespread. Some nations combine elements of both capitalism and socialism and are called social democracies , while their combination of capitalism and socialism is called democratic socialism. It is of heavy dispute whether there are any actual socialist or genuinely communist led states in the world today.
The mechanisms of supply and demand in a competitive market determine the price and quantities of products. In a market characterized by perfect competition, price is determined through the mechanisms of supply and demand.
Prices are influenced both by the supply of products from sellers and by the demand for products by buyers. The quantity of a product that people are willing to buy depends on its price. Generally speaking, we find products more attractive at lower prices, and we buy more at lower prices because our income goes further. Using this logic, we can construct a demand curve that shows the quantity of a product that will be demanded at different prices. The red curve in the diagram represents the daily price and quantity of apples sold by farmers at a local market.
The quantity of a product that a business is willing to sell depends on its price. Businesses are more willing to sell a product when the price rises and less willing to sell it when prices fall.
This fact makes sense: Businesses are set up to make profits, and there are larger profits to be made when prices are high. Now, we can construct a supply curve that shows the quantity of apples that farmers would be willing to sell at different prices, regardless of demand. The supply curve goes in the opposite direction from the demand curve: As prices rise, the quantity of apples that farmers are willing to sell also goes up. We do this by plotting both the supply curve and the demand curve on one graph.
The point at which the two curves intersect is the equilibrium price. But we must be aware that this is a very simplistic example. Things are much more complex in the real world. For one thing, markets rarely operate without outside influences. Circumstances also have a habit of changing. What would happen, for example, if income rose and buyers were willing to pay more for apples?
The demand curve would change, resulting in an increase in equilibrium price. This outcome makes intuitive sense: As demand increases, prices will go up. What would happen if apple crops were larger than expected because of favorable weather conditions? Farmers might be willing to sell apples at lower prices.
If so, the supply curve would shift, resulting in another change in equilibrium price: The increase in supply would bring down prices. The model is commonly applied to wages, in the market for labor. The typical roles of supplier and demander are reversed. The suppliers are individuals, who try to sell their labor for the highest price. The demanders of labor are businesses, which try to buy the type of labor they need at the lowest price.
The equilibrium price for a certain type of labor is the wage rate. Economists can measure the performance of an economy by looking at gross domestic product GDP , a widely used measure of total output. GDP is defined as the market value of all goods and services produced by the economy in a given year.
In the United States, it is calculated by the Department of Commerce. GDP includes only those goods and services produced domestically; goods produced outside the country are excluded. GDP also includes only those goods and services that are produced for the final user; intermediate products are excluded. In contrast, pure capitalism is a free, private economic system that allows voluntary and competing private individuals to plan, produce, and trade without coercive public interference.
There are many political and moral connotations wrapped up in the centuries-old, ongoing debate between statist thinkers and free-market thinkers. On a simplistic level, the differences between the types of economic systems are straightforward.
Some systems place a higher value on the rights of individual property owners, while others place a higher value on government oversight of production and distribution. In a nutshell, there are three overarching categories of economic systems: socialism, capitalism, and mixed economies. An economic system that's centrally planned with some degree of state or social control of production is called socialism.
In extreme forms of this category, the government controls the output and prices of good and services. In the most extreme forms of the socialist system, decisions about how to distribute the goods and services are entirely made by the government.
In other words, under extreme socialism, people are solely reliant on the government for food, housing, income, and healthcare. North Korea—a state-run dictatorship—is a far-extreme example of a fully socialist system. Capitalism is an economic system wherein private companies and individuals own property and capital goods. The fundamental basis of capitalism is that the market or the forces influencing the market determines prices and production in the economy.
In other words, the amount produced as well as the prices of goods and services are determined primarily by the supply and demand for those goods and services. As a result, capitalism is often referred to as a market economy , which is in stark contrast to a centrally planned economy by a government or command economy. Pure capitalism—an extreme form of capitalism—is also known as laissez-faire capitalism.
In pure capitalism, private property rights and freedom of contract are the dominant frameworks of production and trade. The laissez-faire economy evolves out of a system of respected private property rights. Pure capitalism means that the less government involvement in the economy, the better off are its citizens and businesses, as well as the entire economy. Laissez-faire roughly translates from French to mean "let do" or "leave alone. In this extreme form of capitalism, property owners—including the owners of machines, capital, and other input resources—may contract and trade with each other as they see fit, irrespective of the wants of government.
A mixed economic system is an economy in which there exists private ownership by businesses and individuals i. In a mixed economy, the state allows varying degrees of freedom between producers and consumers.
A mixed economy places varying limits on property rights as well. Property owners are restricted with regard to how they exchange with one another. These restrictions come in many forms, such as minimum wage laws, tariffs, quotas, windfall taxes , license restrictions, prohibited products or contracts, direct public expropriation , anti-trust legislation, legal tender laws , subsidies, and eminent domain. Nearly every country in the world has a mixed economy, including the United States.
Even relatively free-market economies, such as Hong Kong or Australia, are still mixed.
0コメント